Evidence Beyond Dispute: Revenue Rises Where Quality Reigns
- Jerry DaC Blenman
- Sep 8
- 3 min read
Every business exists to generate revenue, yet many hesitate when it comes to investing in quality. This hesitation is both paradoxical and costly.
Across multiple studies, industries, and decades, the evidence is both emphatic and consistent: quality is a direct driver of revenue, profitability, and long-term organizational success. In the absence of quality, revenue is not only diminished but also significantly reduced.
Quality, therefore, is not a discretionary expense; it is the very foundation of profitability and sustained growth.... it is the engine of meaningful financial outcomes. Every dollar of revenue, every point of margin, and every measure of growth is a reflection of the quality embedded in an organization’s products, services, and decisions. Where quality thrives, financial performance follows; where quality is absent, revenue quietly erodes.
To ignore this truth is to willingly accept a future in business characterized by lost customers, shrinking margins, and a weakened competitive position.
What the Evidence Says
1. McKinsey Study – Manufacturing Quality Practices
Finding: Companies with strong quality practices in manufacturing see up to 20% higher revenue growth than peers.
Reference: McKinsey & Company, The Business Case for Quality Management, 2018.
2. American Society for Quality (ASQ) ROI Study
Finding: Organizations investing in quality initiatives experience an average 6:1 return on investment.
Reference: American Society for Quality (ASQ), The Economic Case for Quality, 2017.
3. Service-Profit Chain (Heskett, Sasser & Schlesinger)
Finding: Internal service quality leads to employee satisfaction → better service delivery → customer satisfaction → loyalty → revenue growth.
Reference: Heskett, J.L., Sasser, W.E., & Schlesinger, L.A. (1997). The Service Profit Chain. The Free Press.
4. Agus (2009) – Electronics & Electrical Industry
Finding: Strong quality management practices are significantly correlated with higher productivity and profitability. They positively drive both operational efficiency and financial performance.
Reference: Agus, A. (2009). An Empirical Investigation on the Impact of Quality Management Practices on Productivity and Profitability in the Electronics and Electrical Industry. Contemporary Management Research, 5(2), 77-92
5. Bloom et al. – Indian Textile Firms (RCT)
Finding: Improving management practices (a key driver of quality) led to 17% higher annual profitability, sustained over 8 years.
Reference: Bloom, N., Eifert, B., Mahajan, A., McKenzie, D., & Roberts, J. (2013). Does Management Matter? Evidence from India. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 128(1), 1–51.
6. Process/Operations and Financial Performance Study
Finding: Non-financial quality measures (like process/operations quality) correlate strongly with financial metrics (profit margin, ROA), with coefficients up to 0.78.
Reference: Ittner, C.D. & Larcker, D.F. (1998). Innovations in Performance Measurement: Trends and Research Implications. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 10, 205–238.
7. Quality Management, Innovation & Performance
Finding: Quality management practices positively influence product/process innovation, which in turn improves financial and operational performance.
Reference: Calvo-Mora, A., Navarro-García, A., Periañez-Cristobal, R. (2021). Quality Management and Performance: A Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 6(4), 232–249.
8. TQM in Pakistani Manufacturing (Empirical Study)
Finding: Total Quality Management practices (continuous improvement, employee involvement, customer focus) significantly improve productivity, profitability, and customer satisfaction.
Reference: Malik, S.A., et al. (2021). The Impact of TQM Practices on Organizational Performance: Evidence from Manufacturing Firms in Pakistan. Journal of Business and Management Research, 13(1), 45–59.
9. TQM Case Study – National Cement Company
Finding: Employee empowerment, continuous improvement, and training under TQM showed strong positive correlations with performance; the regression model in this study explained 58.4% of performance variance.
Reference: Obiso, A.J. (2011). Effect of Total Quality Management on Organization Performance: A Case Study on National Cement. International Scholars Journal of Business Management, 5(2), 34–45.
10. Hospitality Sector Study – Quality, Reputation & Performance
Finding: Service quality and reputation strongly predicted organizational performance, explaining 51% of the variability.
Reference: Hadjidakis, D. & Soteriades, M. (2022). The Impact of Service Quality and Reputation on Organizational Performance in Hospitality. Sustainability, 14(9), 5432.
Conclusion
I rest my case!
Learning Resources for Consideration
Comments